Meena Kumari is one
of my favourite actresses of all time, possibly the most favourite of my
favourites. So, when, a few years ago, I saw a book touted to be ‘The Classic
Biography of Meena Kumari’, I had to pick it up. For various reasons, I didn’t review
it then. Better late than never...
Meena Kumari’s
enduring image is that of a tragedienne – the role she enacted in the latter
part of her career only served to enhance this image. Her loneliness in her
later years, and her tragic, untimely death, of cirrhosis of the liver, brought on by
her excessive drinking, only enshrined her as the living embodiment of a
suffering artiste.
HarperCollins India
Rs: 350/-
Pages: 227
|
However, her life
and indeed, she, herself, cannot be entrapped in stereotypes. For someone who
lived her life honestly and openly, it is only fit that her biography chronicles
her life, her achievements and her troubles. ‘Meena Kumari – The Classic Biography’ is not a new work, but a
dusted off version of an old one, written almost immediately after the actress’s
death in 1972. It was republished by HarperCollins in 2013, 41 years after
Meena Kumari’s untimely death.
‘Meena Kumari – The Classic Biography’ is veteran editor Vinod
Mehta’s ode to the heroine he adored, the actress to whom his dedication reads,
‘Wish I’d known you’. Written at a time when he was a struggling copywriter,
the book was delivered in seven months; too short a time when you look at the
life it was meant to chronicle. The difficulty was not just the short deadline;
it was that ‘Everything connected with her life had at least four versions…’
However, Mehta persisted, and despite the challenges of finding people willing
to talk to him (even if only to give him one more version of an incident),
managed to elicit the different facets of Meena Kumari as a person and as an actress.
In a conceit that
seems, well, conceited, in present day, Mehta writes of the late actress as ‘my
heroine’, a possessiveness that sometimes made me cringe with its twee-ness. He
also begins at the end – with her death, and works his way backwards towards
her early childhood and career. Yes, the young Mahjabeen had already begun
working to support her family.
The first part of
the biography is a linear narrative tracing her life and career – her birth in
1932 to Ali Bux and Iqbal Begum, their early days of penury, her initiation to
the film studios at the age of 4 (by the early 40s, young Meena (so named for
the screen) was charging a stupendous amount of Rs10,000 per film), her rise to stardom with Baiju Bawra,
her love affair with the much-older, already-married Kamal Amrohi, her marriage to him in
opposition to her father’s wishes when she was barely 20, the resultant estrangement with her family, her years of alcoholism
and her lonely, tragic death.
Mehta raises the
curtains on the marriage of ‘Chandan’ and his ‘Manju’, the glorious love affair
that was doomed not to last. Meena appeared to have changed one gilded cage for another – gender roles were as firmly entrenched in her
marriage, and Amrohi’s expectations restricted Meena’s independence. His
restrictions on who could enter her dressing room, the curfew he imposed on her
shooting hours, the imposition of his assistant trailing his actress wife
wherever she went – all this eventually led to an acrimonious split. Her
personal conflicts were in direct contradiction to her professional trajectory –
the 1960s were her era, and Meena Kumari ruled the marquee with stunning
performances which embraced both critical acclaim and box office success. She reigned
supreme.
The second part of
the biography sees Mehta assessing his heroine both as an actress and a person.
He remarks on her wonderful voice
and the cadences of her speech, the ability to do with one glance what would
take others several pages of dialogue to impart. He concludes that she was 'the greatest actress of them all'. You may or may not agree with his conclusions but one has to admit that he
makes a good argument and defends it well.
At the peak of her career came her most riveting
performance as Chhoti Bahu in Sahib Bibi
aur Ghulam. In an excerpt from her diary, Mehta gives her voice: ‘This woman [Chhoti Bahu] is troubling me a great deal. All day long –
and a good part of the night – it is nothing else but Chhoti Bahu’s smiles, hopes,
tribulations… Oh, I’m sick of it!’
Mehta also devotes
an entire chapter to Pakeezah – its
genesis, its making affected by the bitterness between its two ‘owners’ – the film
that Meena completed despite her ill-health. She was devastated when it opened
to poor reviews, but her death changed the film’s fortunes. In death, as in
life, Meena had ‘made’ the film (she had put in her own money to make it, and
had taken as her fees, one gold mohur).
Mehta chronicles
Meena’s boredom with the ostentatious parties that were part of her
professional world, and how she was deemed a snob by those who didn’t know her. He writes of her intelligence, her multi-lingual skills, and her interest in books – by all accounts, she was a voracious reader. She was also a decent poet, and egged on by Gulzar, released an album of her poetry titled 'I Write, I Recite'. Interspersed with these are interesting anecdotes – a run-in, for example, with a dacoit who turned out to be her fan
(and asked her to autograph his arm with his knife).
Mehta also chronicles her involvement with Dharmendra and with Gulzar, one romantic, the other intellectual. In doing so, however, Mehta is constrained by lack of information given that neither
Dharmendra nor Gulzar agreed to speak to him about their relationship with Meena. However, Gulzar remained a loyal, steadfast friend till the end, and Meena willed her
poems and diaries to him. Gulzar has remained a loyal guardian of its
contents. Meena's involvement with men is also the subject of some of the spicier
(though not salacious) anecdotes in the book, and I had to admit I laughed out loud at her insouciant
remark, ’Raat gayi, baat gayi’ to an ardent admirer. How refreshing to see the
human side of an archetypal Bharatiya
Nari!
Mehta does state at
the outset that ‘it would be a brave, possibly foolish man’ who would attempt a
biography of the actress, but his version is meticulously researched, and he has
spoken to all the key figures in Meena’s life (except Dharmendra, who refused
to talk to him), and then reconciled their contradictory versions to a cohesive
whole. He's quite scathing about her numerous relatives, all of whom, in his estimation, treated Meena as the proverbial golden goose.
Mehta’s writing is
at once subjective and detached (as must any commissioned work of art be), and
he himself had little to do with the film industry at the time he wrote this
book. In fact, much though the use of ‘my heroine’ makes it seem like he’s writing
a purely opinionated piece on the actress, he confesses that the woman whose
portrait he had been asked to sketch, ‘interested
me immensely – not while she was alive, but once she was dead…. In the timing
and manner of her death, my heroine assumed heroic dimensions.’
He also writes in this newly updated version that he had compromised his narrative by ‘the gratuitous insertion of [his] own personality’ and that he could have improved his work if he had been more detached. I’m glad that in revising the text for the re-release, Mehta did not rework his original text to make it more impersonal or prosaic. Indeed, he makes no effort to mask his distinctive voice, and is, by turns, opinionated and sympathetic, even snarky. Witness this gem, for example: [After quoting from Meena’s account of how helpful Ashok Kumar was during the shooting of Parineeta, Mehta remarks:} ‘Like me, you are probably wondering where the director was while these lessons were going on.’ That said, I do wish that, being an editor of some note himself, Mehta had bothered to – from the vantage point of four decades’ experience – brush up some of his flawed prose, rhetorical flourishes, and awkward grammatical structure.
He also writes in this newly updated version that he had compromised his narrative by ‘the gratuitous insertion of [his] own personality’ and that he could have improved his work if he had been more detached. I’m glad that in revising the text for the re-release, Mehta did not rework his original text to make it more impersonal or prosaic. Indeed, he makes no effort to mask his distinctive voice, and is, by turns, opinionated and sympathetic, even snarky. Witness this gem, for example: [After quoting from Meena’s account of how helpful Ashok Kumar was during the shooting of Parineeta, Mehta remarks:} ‘Like me, you are probably wondering where the director was while these lessons were going on.’ That said, I do wish that, being an editor of some note himself, Mehta had bothered to – from the vantage point of four decades’ experience – brush up some of his flawed prose, rhetorical flourishes, and awkward grammatical structure.
However, flaws and
all, ‘Meena Kumar: The Classic Biography’
is a very engaging, remarkably sympathetic look at a woman who wanted to
love and be loved, a woman who deeply missed the things that life didn’t
give her. Mehta makes no
bones about his admiration for the legendary actress, and makes it clear that
Meena lived her life according to her wishes, and like many of us, regretted
the consequences of some of her actions. Certainly, she paid a tragic price. ‘My heroine’ comes across as an intelligent, complex woman, multi-talented
and engaging.
'Wish I had known you...' Yes, I wish I had, too.
No comments:
Post a Comment