A Heart in Winter
Directed by Claude Sautet
Music: Maurice Ravel
Starring: Daniel Auteuil, Emmanuelle Béart,
André Dussollier, Brigitte Catillon,
Élizabeth Bourgine
|
I
fell in love with Emmanuelle Béart when I first saw her in Un Cœur en Hiver
in the time of VHS tapes. Daniel Auteuil has been a favourite forever, and I’ve
been wanting to review this film ever since. It’s only recently that Netflix
made the film available on DVD, and I settled down for a re-watch. I was
curious to see how I would feel about the film nearly 20 years since I first
watched it. More about that later.
Un Cœur en Hiver begins
with Stéphane’s voiceover – he runs the studio for Maxime (André Dussollier),
who takes care of the commercial aspects of the business, including customer
relations. Maxime, says Stéphane, likes to win, and he, Stéphane, doesn’t mind
losing. Stéphane is happy with his work, and lives vicariously through Maxime. Stéphane
is happy being in the background, and is happier still to immerse himself in
the world of music. When he’s not repairing or building violins, he’s
listening to the rehearsals or concerts of his clients. Maxime, on the other
hand, is a world traveller, lover and liver of the good life. He’s married, but
his marriage has settled into boredom, to mitigate which he indulges in transient relationships. The understanding between the two men is such that
they don’t need words to communicate. It’s a match made in heaven.
Until,
one day, Maxime takes Stéphane out to lunch. He has something very important to
say. “What’s it?” asks Stéphane, completely deadpan. “I’ll tell you when you
wipe that grin off your face,” says Maxime. “It’s gone,” says Stéphane, without
moving a muscle. From the conversation that follows, we learn that Maxime has
fallen in love. The woman in question is Camille (Emmanuelle Béart), a rising
concert violinist.
So
much in love, in fact, that he’s asked his wife for a divorce. What’s more,
he’s rented an apartment nearby which he’s having done up, so he can move in
with Camille. Stéphane is surprised – Maxime almost always tells him of his
affairs. Why has been so silent for so long? Because of his concern for
Camille, says Maxime. Camille is understandably nervous about their
relationship, feeling it’s been moving too quickly, and Maxime doesn’t want to
impose upon her. Besides, Camille is devoted to her art, and Maxime wants her
career to flourish.
So
when is he going to meet her, asks Stéphane. ‘’Look straight ahead,” says
Maxime. Camille is having lunch with her agent, Régine (Brigitte Catillon) a
couple of tables away.
Sensing Stéphane’s look, Camille casts an interested
glance their way. On their way out, Maxime joins the two women. It’s clear to Stéphane
that he dotes on Camille.
Now
that Maxime has ‘introduced’ her to Stéphane, so to speak, he brings her around
more often. Stéphane doesn’t have much to say, really, but his very quietness
intrigues Camille. Stéphane, too, is more interested than he lets on.
When he
visits his old teacher, Lachaume (Maurice Garrell) he asks him about Camille.
She had been his student just as Stéphane and Maxime had once been. Lachaume
speaks highly of her; he remembers her as a ‘smooth, hard girl’ who kept to
herself, but remarks that beneath her discipline, she had a temper.
Meanwhile,
Camille comes to the shop with Régine, because her violin has been giving her
trouble. She plays for Stéphane, and the latter is quick to spot the problem.
Camille leaves her violin behind so Stéphane can fix the defect, but reminds
him that she needs it for a professional recording on Friday. Stéphane promises
to have it ready. During
the recording, however, Camille is distracted.
She knows she’s slowing down the
movement. Stéphane, who’s in the audience, quietly gets up and leaves.
Stéphane’s
only real friend is Hélène (Élizabeth Bourgine), who owns a bookstore. She
understands him. It is to her that Stéphane mentions his complicated
relationship with Camille. Attraction is too strong a word, and Stéphane
doesn’t believe in love. And it seems to him that love is everywhere, even in
cookbooks. “Do you find that obscene?” asks Hélène. No, replies Stéphane. “The
literary description of love is often very beautiful.” But he’s sure that
Camille hates him. Hélène smiles – she’s sure Stéphane enjoys it.
When
he next meets Camille, it’s at a dinner at Lachaume’s house. There’s a heated
discussion about what constitutes art and who gets to decide what art really
is. Stéphane, as is his wont, doesn’t participate. When pressed by Camille to
give his opinion, he admits that both sides have valid points. ‘So we cancel
each other?’ asks Camille. Stéphane shrugs. Lachaume is amused. What Stéphane
means, he points out, is that they might as well shut up. Stéphane agrees that
that is a tempting thought. Annoyed, Camille snaps that they run the risk of
being wrong by speaking up; by keeping quiet, Stéphane can appear to be
intelligent. “Perhaps I’m just afraid,” demurs Stéphane.
The
next day, Camille stops by the shop to pick Maxime up. Maxime, in the middle of
a lucrative deal, excuses himself to talk to the client. At a loose end,
Camille wanders over to where Stéphane is supervising his assistant, Brise
(Stanislas Carré de Malberg). She watches him intently without him noticing
her.
When
Stéphane looks up to see Camille, he’s pleasantly surprised. He offers her a
drink where Camille, uncharacteristically for her, opens up about her
relationship with Régine, who has been consequential in furthering her career.
Yet, she’s beginning to feel suffocated by her mentor. Stéphane offers her an
armchair psychoanalysis. Maxime is glad to see Stéphane and Camille get along.
Hélène,
whom Stéphane meets for lunch the next afternoon, wants to know if Stéphane is
in love with Camille. Though hesitant, Stéphane is unequivocal in his denial.
Hélène pokes further – Camille is in love with Maxime, after all, isn’t she?
Well, yes, concurs, Stéphane, though he had the impression that Camille would
have preferred to dine with him the previous night.
Perhaps
it is this feeling that prompts Stéphane to beat Maxime at racquet ball the
next day. For a change, he’s the victor, and Maxime, who’s leaving for London
that day, is amused. He’ll let Stéphane savour his victory, he smiles. On a
whim, Stéphane visits Camille at her rehearsals and invites her to lunch.
Surprised, Camille agrees and they spend a pleasant hour talking. Camille makes
her interest in Stéphane quite clear.
But
Stéphane seems to have gone back into his shell. He begins to avoid Camille,
and when she finally gets him on the phone, he’s quick to tell her that he’s
busy. His avoidance disturbs Camille, and begins to affect her performances.
Meanwhile,
Maxime has returned from London. He whisks Stéphane off to show him the new
apartment. It’s clear that Stéphane is disturbed at the thought of Maxime
sharing the apartment with Camille. And Maxime begins to suspect that Stéphane’s
feelings for Camille are deeper than even he will admit.
It’s
a suspicion that is soon to be confirmed – following a chance meeting with Stéphane
at a restaurant, Camille confesses to Maxime that she loves Stéphane. Though
hurt, Maxime withdraws with grace.
Will
Camille get the happy ending she craves? Will Stéphane admit, even to himself,
that Camille has become very important to his happiness? What will happen to Stéphane’s
partnership with Maxime?
On
the face of it, Un Cœur en Hiver is the usual love story, a romantic
triangle between one woman and two men. Does it resolve and end in ‘happy every
after’? Certainly, a more usual film might have done so. But as Roger Ebert
points out, “…characters in French films seem more grownup than those in
American films. They do not consider love and sex as a teenager might, as
prizes in life. Instead, they are challenges and responsibilities, not always
to be embraced.”
Claude
Sautet tells the story of these three lovers, painting muddled emotions with
delicacy. Love in Un Cœur en Hiver is as messy as it often is, in real
life. The characters all do things they regret, and there are no do-overs.
Second chances may not always be there, and if they are, one might not always
want to take them. Love can be incomplete.
Stéphane
is a man who cannot love, at least not as most people would define ‘love’. When
Camille asks him whether he’s staying away from her because Maxime is a friend,
Stéphane remarks that Maxime is his partner, not a friend. Camille is surprised
– Maxime considers Stéphane a friend. That’s his problem, responds Stéphane.
Auteuil has a very mobile face, but in this film, there’s a stillness about it
that’s deceptive. As Stéphane, he’s visibly awkward in social situations, and
his natural reserve underlines his inability to commit to intimacy in a
relationship. The damage that he inflicts on Camille is not deliberate; the
lack of an emotional core does not allow him to feel the intensity of her
emotions, or to even understand them. It’s an inward-looking performance and
Auteuil plays him with pinpoint accuracy. Any less emotion and he might have
come across as wooden. Any more, and the character would have tipped over into
a cad.
But
the performance that stood out for me was that of Emmanuelle Béart’s. She
puts in a bravura performance as Camille, a woman who falls in love with a man
she cannot have. What’s even more impressive is that Béart practiced the violin
for nearly a year so she could look authentic playing Ravel’s sonatas on
screen.
Like
Auteuil, Béart has a tough line to straddle – a woman who falls in love with
her lover’s friend is not usually a very sympathetic character. Béart's beauty only adds to her performance as the rigidly controlled Camille. So, when, in one shot, she stoops to a
very public recrimination of Stéphane, almost unhinged in her emotional devastation, the deliberate sloppiness of her very garish makeup is doubly disturbing.
In Béart’s capable hands, the scene becomes poignant rather than overly melodramatic. In
the film’s final shot, Camille turns to look at Stéphane through the car
window. They have made their peace with each other. It’s good-bye.
It’s a shot
that has haunted me ever since I watched this film the first time. It’s the
only time I’ve seen someone’s heart in their eyes.
No comments:
Post a Comment